|
The followers of Assaji and
Punabbasu. They lived in
Kītāgiri, between
Sāvatthi and Ālavi,
and were guilty of various evil practices. They used to grow flowers, make
wreaths and garlands, and send them to girls and women of respectable families
and also to slave girls, to lie with such women, and disregard the precepts
regarding the eating of food at the wrong time, using perfumes, visiting shows,
singing and playing games of various sorts (they violated eighteen precepts,
Sp.iii.625). Their abandoned ways of life won popularity for them, and virtuous
monks, who did not belong to their group, were not welcomed by the people of the
neighbourhood.
The Buddha heard of their nefarious doings from
a monk who had been sojourning in the district, and having convened a meeting of
the Sangha, sent Sāriputta and
Moggallāna, together with a number
of other monks, (for the recalcitrant were passionate and violent), to carry out
the Pabbājaniyakamma (Act of Banishment) against them. The deputation of the
Sangha went to Kītāgiri and made an order that the Assaji-Punabbasukā should no
longer dwell there, but the latter, instead of obeying the injunction, abused
the monks, accusing them of partiality, and not only departed from Kītāgiri, but
also left the Order. When the matter was reported to the Buddha he had the
Pabbājaniyakamma revoked ("because it had served no purpose") (Vin.ii.9-13, 14,
15).
In the Dhammapada Commentary (ii.109) we are told that Assaji and Punabbasu
had originally been disciples of Sāriputta and Moggallāna, and that when the two
Aggasāvakas admonished them and their followers on the wickedness of their
conduct, some of them reformed themselves and a few retired to the householder's
life.
The Assaji-Punabbasukas seem to have had a special dislike for Sāriputta and
Moggallāna. Once the Buddha, on his way somewhere from Sāvatthi, accompanied by
Sāriputta, Moggallāna and five hundred others, sent word to the
Assaji-Punabbasukas to prepare sleeping places for them. They sent answer that
the Buddha was very welcome, but not Sāriputta and Moggallāna, because "they
were men of sinful desires and influenced by such desires." (Vin.ii.171)
But elsewhere (Kītāgiri Sutta, M.i.473ff)
even the Buddha is represented as having been lightly regarded by them. When it
was reported to them that the Buddha lived on only one meal a day and found that
it made him well and healthy, their reply was that they themselves ate in the
evening and the early morning and at noon and outside prescribed hours, and that
they found this quite agreeable and saw no reason for changing their mode of
life. It is true, however, that even on this occasion when the Buddha sent for
them, they came dutifully and listened patiently to his admonition on the
necessity of implicit obedience to a teacher in whom they had faith, and we are
told that they were "even gladdened in their hearts" after hearing the Buddha.
There is, however, no evidence that they reformed after hearing him.
In the Commentaries (E.g., DA.ii.525) the Assaji-Punabbasukā are mentioned as
an example of those who paid no heed to precepts great or small, which they had
undertaken to observe.
The Samantapāsādikā (iii.614) mentions that Kītāgiri was chosen by them as
residence because it was watered by both monsoons, produced three crops, and had
suitable sites for buildings.
They were five hundred in number.

|